The quality in reviews
I'm writing beer reviews since a long time. What I want know from you is how the quality of a review could be determined. Just giving a 10 stars might not be enough, even if Bayesin algorithms can do a lot.
I'm looking into determining the quality of a review from the professional perspective since some years. "It tastes like tart" isn't enough. We need more criterias.
I have seen many different beer tasting sheets. I'm wondering if you guys have some pictures for me from example from DLG, Camra, etc.
Perhaps you'd like to share.
Submitted by nick on 29. October 2011 - 3:18
I'm writing beer reviews since a long time. What I want know from you is how the quality of a review could be determined. Just giving a 10 stars might not be enough, even if Bayesin algorithms can do a lot.
I'm looking into determining the quality of a review from the professional perspective since some years. "It tastes like tart" isn't enough. We need more criterias.
I have seen many different beer tasting sheets. I'm wondering if you guys have some pictures for me from example from DLG, Camra, etc.
Perhaps you'd like to share.
Upcoming Events
No event here yet. Add one!
So it's quality vs. quantity.
So it's quality vs. quantity. I doubt that there are any schems out there to determin the quality of a product that could alter from time to time. Perhaps the industry could tell us more.
clihasi, there are many
clihasi, there are many "schems" and most work great.
nick, the Bayesian probability is very good. Haven't used it on my own yet.
@clihasi, could you provide
@clihasi, could you provide some links? would be cool if I could start comparing this week...
nick, check Cyclops
nick, check Cyclops http://www.camra.org.uk/page.aspx?o=207431 - you will need an account.